Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Trevor Svajda vs Henry Searle Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Svajda vs Searle analysis and find out who is favored!
Trevor Svajda vs Henry Searle Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Svajda 0 - 0 Searle
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Svajda has won 52.09% of points on his second serve, while Searle has won 52.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Svajda, in recent form, has won 52.65% of his opponent's second serve points, while Searle has won 45.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.2% and 30.5% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Svajda has saved 60% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Searle has saved 69.72% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Svajda has won 64% of matches played (W/L 16/ 9), with Searle winning 55.56% (W/L 20/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Svajda has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 17/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Searle has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 11/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Svajda has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.22% of matches (W/L 13/ 5), where as Searle has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 17/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Svajda has played against opponents with an average rank of 156.52 while Searle has played against players with an average rank of 227.08.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Svajda has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Searle has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Svajda has converted 49.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Searle has converted 51.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
732
Rank
721
High
18
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
634
Rank
631
High
18
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
61% (17-11)
Career Total W/L
50% (22-22)
73% (8-3)
YTD W/L
55% (12-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Trevor Svajda | Henry Searle |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 73% (8/3) | 55% (12/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (16/8) | 54% (27/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (125/100) | 52% (256/237) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 80% (8/2) | 80% (4/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 56% (5/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.46 |
| Aces Total | 30 | 110 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 21 | 43 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:4 | 1:47:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 212.91 | 280.32 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (412/723) | 66% (1054/1600) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (284/412) | 69% (729/1054) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (162/311) | 53% (288/546) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (37/75) | 51% (56/109) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (307/713) | 36% (543/1503) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 43% (3/4) |
| Futures W/L | 86% (6/1) | 60% (9/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (7/10) | 52% (11/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 25% (2/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 29% (2/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 100% (9/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 0% (9/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 40% (5/2) | 15% (13/2) |
Trevor Svajda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Trevor Svajda
Player
Ernesto Escobedo
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
25 of
30)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Nishesh Basavareddy
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Samir Banerjee
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
22 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
55
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(3) ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Karue Sell
53%
(
52 of
99)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
57%
(
27 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Omni Kumar
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Emile Hudd
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Trevor Svajda
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Mitchell Harper
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Trevor Svajda
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
10
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
38 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
16 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Trevor Svajda
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Henry Searle Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Henry Searle
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Emile Hudd
85%
(
55 of
65)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Paul Jubb
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Robin Bertrand
83%
(
45 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Adam Jones
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Henry Searle
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Henry Searle
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Jeff Wolf
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Henry Searle
56%
(
60 of
108)
1st Serve %
67%
(
75 of
112)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
63%
(
30 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
36 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(8) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lewie Lane
Player
Henry Searle
61%
(
57 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Svajda Vs Searle Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Trevor Svajda
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
